Keith Azopardi KC MP

GSD Leader

For A Bright Future

Welcome to the home of the GSD. We trust that you will discover this platform to be a valuable source of information regarding our Party, its objectives, and the concepts we champion in various domains.

I have been enthusiastic about revamping this website as a means to interact with you. It will complement our presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and TikTok. However, please understand that this digital presence does not replace our commitment to direct engagement, which we pursue through our community outreach initiatives and private meetings. If you have any concerns you’d like to discuss, please don’t hesitate to get in touch, and we will gladly arrange a meeting with you.

Our dedication to Gibraltar is profound. Our community has been constructed through centuries of unwavering effort and the resilience of successive generations of Gibraltarians and long-term residents. Together, we have built the nation we proudly call home. We aspire to ensure its prosperity, stability, and development for future generations. We firmly believe in our right to our land and our right to shape our destiny. Our objective is to guarantee the finest living conditions for all who have chosen Gibraltar as their home, while ensuring sustainability in environmental, economic, and political aspects.

This website offers information about our Party, essential documents, policies, and video resources. If you share our goals and are interested in joining our cause, you can find membership details here.

We would greatly appreciate your support and contributions to our endeavors.

Latest Facebook

GET INVOLVED

We are interested in meeting you in person hearing from you and to listen to your thoughts and ideas, help us give you the voice to make a difference.

Find out more

GSD News

Firefighters Owed Support and Investment Not Just Praise

By News

Firefighters Owed Support and Investment Not Just Praise

 

The GSD commends the courage and commitment of the Gibraltar Fire and Rescue Service, and the Airport Fire and Rescue Service who supported them, in their response to the blaze at the One Bayside construction site on Wednesday evening.

 

Joelle Ladislaus, Shadow for Emergency Services said: “The incident which firefighters responded to on Wednesday clearly presented an enormous challenge, reflected both in the number of firefighters despatched to the scene and the need to call upon the AFRS to assist. The sheer bravery and professionalism of those who attended the scene did not go unnoticed; Gibraltar saw the very best of its fire and rescue services.

 

Gratitude, however, must be accompanied by tangible support. The service needs to have the modern equipment, facilities and resources to enable it to continue responding to the needs of Gibraltar, which presents unique challenges due to our landscape and geographical location. Unlike other fire and rescue services around the world, our firefighters must be trained and ready to respond to incidents at sea, within the nature reserve and in densely populated urban areas, like Wednesday’s blaze was situated in.

 

Investment in our GFRS should not however stop at equipment and training, it should also include the new fire station which the Government has now been promising for 15 years, and which should provide firefighters with purpose-built training areas and space to store appliances and equipment, like the aerial ladder, which is yet to arrive in Gibraltar, and for which there is a clear need given the increase in the number of high rise buildings.

 

The recent incident is a reminder of the vital role which our firefighters play in keeping Gibraltar safe, and the sacrifices that they make to ensure that they do so. Simple praise for their efforts is not enough; they are owed support and investment so that they are in the best position when the next incident arises.”

Beyond the McGrail Inquiry: It Starts from the Top

By News
Beyond the McGrail Inquiry: It Starts from the Top
• Keith Azopardi will sever links with his law firm if elected as Chief Minister
• Maximum of 8-year term-limits as Chief Minister to be made law
• Ministers & other individuals closely connected with Party in power will be banned by law from award of public contracts
Leader of the Opposition, Keith Azopardi said: “We need to learn the lessons of the last few years. The commitments I have made today emphasise how we would run things in a very different way to this GSLP leadership. A Chief Minister has a special role that can exercise influence and power well beyond other Ministers. It is right that there should be higher commitments attached to that role to ensure better democratic protections now and always.”
Overall
If the lessons of the McGrail Inquiry are truly to be learned then there needs to be a change in the way things have been done. That means clear commitments that start from the Office of the Chief Minister and anyone aspiring to hold that role. Today we set out clear commitments from the GSD that would be binding on a GSD Chief Minister and Ministers.
Real change will only come by electing a GSD Government. You will not get change when the baton is passed from Fabian Picardo to Gemma Arias-Vasquez given her integral support for Mr Picardo’s improper action or attempts to interfere in a criminal investigation that were described in the Openshaw Report and the disgraceful attack on the previous Principal Auditor. Equally she is mired in the same conflicts. All you will get is more of the same in a repackaged form.
Mr Picardo has been a partner on sabbatical of Hassans over the last 15 years. Ms Arias-Vasquez has been a partner on sabbatical of Hassans for the last three years and will now clearly take the role of GSLP leader soon and presumably immediately as Chief Minister. The conflicts that exist today and have existed by virtue of those links will remain.
The Context: The Insidious Conflicts
The Report of Sir Peter Openshaw after the McGrail Inquiry was shocking. People were right to have been taken aback not just by the evidence they heard during the live-streamed Inquiry hearings in 2024 but by the insidious conflicts of interest revealed by the evidence that affected the GSLP/Libs Government.
 At the heart of the original criminal investigation opened by the Police was an entity (36 North) in which the Chief Minister through his partnership in his law firm (Hassans) had a beneficial interest. 36 North had been  vying for a lucrative public contract. It is now well-known that Sir Peter Openshaw considered that on a number of occasions Fabian Picardo acted in a grossly improper way and attempted to interfere in a criminal investigation which impacted on his friend and mentor and senior partner of the law firm.
The Inquiry gave people a glimpse into the conflicts of interest of the GSLP Government and how they were not properly managed. They laid bare the desperate need for real and lasting change to ensure systems to prevent abuses of power are in place.
However, the McGrail Inquiry only determined the circumstances that led to the retirement of Ian McGrail. It did not – for example –provide an opinion on the propriety of the Chief Minister (or any other Minister) holding beneficial interests in 36 North or into the circumstances in which that company was interested in securing a lucrative £1M public contract. Nor did the McGrail Inquiry address anything beyond its strict remit. This was, at times, made clear by its Chairman.
McGrail Inquiry – The Tip of the Iceberg
We have always said that when the dust settled after the McGrail Inquiry it was important to reflect on it in a wider context and learn lessons – not just of the facts found in it but of the wider things going on in Gibraltar. Because the McGrail Inquiry findings are just the tip of the iceberg.
The GSD has been campaigning for some years on the need to ensure that reforms are put in place to deliver transparency, value for money and standards. Our specific commitments in those areas in relation to the eligibility to apply for public contracts and on the award and supervision of these have been there since 2019.
We have said for a long time that there were poor controls that lend themselves to waste, abuse and corruption and these needed strengthening.
Over the last couple of years we have seen defining Principal Auditor Reports that have, again, kicked up very serious issues of financial waste and abuse as well as poor governance systems and opacity with the use of taxpayers’ monies or savers monies.
Against that backdrop we have also seen the award of contracts or payments to persons politically close to the GSLP with Government Ministers even refusing to recognise that some of those situations gave rise to any conflicts at all.
The Need for Wider Reforms
As such if comprehensive lessons are to be learned from the McGrail Inquiry the findings must be set against the wider need for reforms to provide further safeguards well beyond the McGrail Inquiry recommendations.
Firstly the recommendations themselves must be implemented fully and not in an insufficient or half-hearted way. We have already made clear our concerns in relation to the proposed GSLP Conflicts of Interest legislation which is simply a toothless monster of bureaucracy that will not properly control conflicts or abuses. It will have the reverse effect and hamper controls. Different legislation is needed.
Secondly we must recognise that we must go beyond McGrail with a deeper and wider set of reforms not picked up by that Inquiry (because of its constrained remit) but which are absolutely essential if we are going to put in place systems that do not allow similar instances of abuse to happen again.
The GSD will have a clear blueprint of action on these issues at the next election. That blueprint will be wide-ranging capturing many of the themes and issues we have set out before as well as new ideas to respond to further challenges.
But we start today with a set of commitments that will impact on the leadership of the Government and Ministers and that marks the difference between the approach of a future GSD administration and the current GSLP/Libs administration.
Some of these first commitments recognise the special role of the Office of the Chief Minister because of the sheer influence it can exercise across the work of Government and well beyond other Ministers. With that in mind Keith Azopardi will commit himself to restrictions that do not currently exist and are not applied by this Government to the Chief Minister’s role. Given the special position of Chief Minister those restrictions (which would be voluntary until the time that a GSD Conflicts of Interest law is passed) would be stronger and immediate in the case of the Office of Chief Minister because we believe they should be as a matter of principle and to send a clear signal of our approach in Government. As such:
1. If the GSD is elected to Government at the next election Keith Azopardi as the new GSD Chief Minister would sever his ties with his law firm. He would divest himself of any partnership interests and retire or resign from the partnership and law firm. His pay as a lawyer would cease. He would not take a sabbatical from the partnership or law firm while he was in office. He would therefore no longer hold any professional ties with any law firm while he was Chief Minister.
2. Additionally, we re-state the long-standing commitment that the next GSD Chief Minister would serve a maximum of two terms or 8 years in office as Chief Minister. To give that commitment more than just political form we will embody that in statutory or constitutional change. That will act as an important trigger for necessary political regeneration in the future as well as an important restriction on length of tenure which will be good for democracy.
3. Further we consider it wrong as a matter of principle that any Minister should have any beneficial interest in any company that seeks the award of or benefits from a public contract. We reaffirm our commitment that Ministers as well as other individuals closely connected to the Party in power and close family members to Ministers will be prohibited from the award of public contracts. Those prohibitions would be made clear in a law that a GSD Government would introduce, There will be another category of more remote restricted (but not prohibited) individuals that would also be defined in statute.
Mr Azopardi continued:
“You can either be in Government or in business with the Government but not both. We have been campaigning for a very long time on the need for robust controls on waste, abuse and corruption. The various examples over the last couple of years ranging from issues raised in the Principal Auditor Reports to the McGrail Inquiry Report to the award of a number of other contracts once again magnify the need for real changes. We will have a very extensive programme on anti-corruption at the next election because it is clear that this Government simply doesn’t have the commitment to act when it often doesn’t even recognise the conflicts or worse still condones misconduct like it did in the case of the Openshaw findings.
The first set of changes unveiled today marks a distinct approach by the GSD as to how we would intend to run a very different form of Government that is more robust on conflicts, more accountable to you and more committed to govern in a different way.”

GSD would reverse Anti-British and Anti-Business aspects of GSLP 9 July Residency Policy

By News

GSD would reverse Anti-British and Anti-Business aspects of GSLP 9 July Residency Policy

A GSD Government would seek to reverse those aspects of the Residency policy introduced by the GSLP/Libs that operate in an anti-British and anti-Business way. That can be done while also protecting public services from undue strain by a series of residence and contribution entitlements for new entrants.

It is not in the interests of Gibraltar to place hurdles on inward investment, job creation or residence that discourage British economic investment while pushing investment or jobs to Spain. Additionally, the GSLP residency policy will, in effect, subject those people who want to work in Gibraltar but are forced to reside in Spain to seek Spanish administrative permissions. This will operate as a further control on our economy by Spain.

The new residency policy that was announced in June has also since then been embodied in the Residency Regulations 2026 commenced on 14 July 2026. By introducing these under the Treaty on Gibraltar and the European Union Act 2026 the GSLP Government have made it more difficult for there to be an easy reversal of any harmful effects of this criticized policy. Future changes may now need to be consulted with the Cooperation Council under the Treaty (and therefore, in effect, with the EU and Spain).

Nick Cruz said: “The new GSLP 9 July law introduced by Ms Gemma Arias-Vasquez that makes UK British citizens second class citizens in British Gibraltar when seeking residence is anti-British and anti-Business. This 9 July Law has been severely criticized by Chamber of Commerce and by the GFSB.” On Thursday 2 July the GFSB publicly released their views warning: “that parts of the policy could make recruitment and retention harder for employers, discourage entrepreneurship and have negative effects on business in Gibraltar”.

Mr Cruz added: “The GSD believes that the best way to protect our British way of life and our social services in the face of the Treaty is to have a successful economy that allows Businesses and individuals to contribute via tax and social insurance. A need to protect both is not served by making the attraction of British investment or job-creation more difficult. Gibraltar’s businesses and its largest sectors (the finance sector) are UK facing, and our business require recruitment from the UK. This should not be made harder.”

The GSLP 9 July Law imposes a minimum salary threshold of gross average earnings (now over £39,500) before a UK citizen can come and live in Gibraltar. That means recruitment of young British citizens (including graduates that our Businesses need) will be less attractive. The agist policy that makes it harder for anyone over 55 years old to come and live in Gibraltar (unless they are rich and have £5M and can apply for CAT 2 Status) will also prevent British entrepreneurship and startups by those senior management and decision makers that are often in their late 50’s and early 60’s. This ill-thought-out policy (now law) has not enjoyed proper consultation with business as is evident from the position of the Chamber the GFSB and the Finance Centre Council. Some of the details of this policy will operate detrimentally to our economy and make Gibraltar perceived to be less attractive and friendly to British investors.

The fact that exceptions to the GSLP 9 July Law are based on grace and favour from the Chief Minister, adds uncertainty and extra costs. Business cannot plan on that basis.

Gibraltar succeeds when everyone succeeds. The best way to protect our public sector and our public services is to foster a successful British Gibraltar business environment that can live harmoniously with our neighbour Spain and the EU but not lose our uniqueness which is our British Heritage, culture and character including our demographics and business offering. Measures like this which discourage British new entrants and give primacy to Spanish labour merely increase our reliance on Spain and can diminish our historical economic links.

As such a GSD Government would consult widely to reverse the negative effects of the GSLP’s 9 July Law with a view to introducing a balanced set of measures that are business friendly, British friendly, business promoting and residency and contribution requirements that avoid any abuse.

We will ensure that those who may be older and therefore cannot contribute in terms of PAYE/SI for sufficient years will need to pay sufficient funds into our consolidated fund or demonstrate sufficient wealth, retirement provision and medical insurance.

Gibraltar has always benefitted from British investment and British people arriving to work and contribute to Gibraltar. We should continue to be an attractive place for British investment because that produces economic benefits for our community.

The GSD will in careful consultation with the GFCC and other stakeholders also review the CAT 2 requirements. It will ensure that this residency status continues to be attractive to those who want to make Gibraltar their home and integrate and invest and this will include consideration of a minimum residency requirement.

Read More