Keith Azopardi

GSD Leader

Building for the future

Welcome to the Gibraltar Social Democrats site. We hope you will find this site informative about the Party, its aims and the ideas we have in a number of areas.

I have been very keen that we should relaunch a new site to use as a platform for some of our interface with you. This will complement our Facebook and twitter presence. Of course this will be no substitute for direct engagement which we are also doing in parallel through our community outreach programme and other private meetings. If you have concerns that you would like to discuss with us by all means feel free to contact us and we will meet with you.

We feel passionately about Gibraltar. Our community has been built over centuries of hard work and perseverance of successive generations of Gibraltarians and long-term residents. Together we have created the small country we call home. We want this to be prosperous, stable and develop for generations to come. We have a right to our land and a right to determine our future. We want to ensure that we create the best living environment for all those who have made Gibraltar their home and that we do so in an environmentally, economically and politically sustainable way.

On this platform you will find information about the Party, key documents, policies and videos. If you share our objectives and want to join us there is also membership information available.

We would be delighted to have your support and contribution to our effort.

Meet the Team

Latest Facebook

GET INVOLVED

We are interested in meeting you in person hearing from you and to listen to your thoughts and ideas, help us give you the voice to make a difference.

Find out more

GSD News

The Fight for the Heart & Soul of Gibraltar

By | News

There is a crisis of the truth.

The hallmark now of Mr Picardo’s Government is that truth, apparently, doesn’t matter or doesn’t matter as much as it should. When the Opposition raises issues we are met with a barrage of ducking and diving or smokescreens aimed at creating confusion. Additionally, if truth or any amount of small challenge on any issue is spoken the Government tries to summarily quash any dissent and replace it by half-truths or outright lies that it eventually hopes will become the truth. That is then compounded by the fact that the public interest, confidentiality, data protection or things being sub judice are rolled out as blankets of silence of convenience for a Government who then systematically abuses the concept when it doesn’t suit it. The truth is being buried and the people are the losers in terms of the quality of our governance. The examples are legion.

So we have a Government that insists that TNG Global were the “highest bidder” in the Bayside/St Anne’s expressions of interest process when quite simply it is obvious that they were not a bidder at all because the entity did not exist at the time. The entity came into existence a full three and a half years after the deadline closed. Instead of re-running the expressions of interest process they decided to give a straight direct land allocation to an entity ultimately controlled by those prepared to bail out the Government from its mistakes by a £3.7M “donation” from a sister entity.

We have a Government that dismisses GibElec’s confirmation that there have been 30 power cuts this year as “nonsense” preferring instead to bandy its own “statistic” of 7 power cuts this year as the truth in a desperate attempt to make the shambles of the electricity situation more credible.

We have a Chief Minister that only under focussed questions in Parliament was willing to say that he had asked the Commissioner of Police to retire for reasons yet unknown but that he has withheld in the “public interest.” What about the public interest of ensuring that there has been no interference with the operational functions of the Police and its senior officers or of ensuring that our constitutional institutions remain sacrosanct? We have a Chief Minister who then under pressure said in July 2020 that he would convene an independent inquiry within “weeks.” 15 months later there are, still, no signs of the inquiry and the Government now say they aren’t committed to a particular date for the inquiry at all. Is timing an issue for this inconvenient inquiry? Is there something to hide?

When the respected Action for Housing Group dare to question a particular housing allocation the Chief Minister launches into a personal attack on the unimpeachable Henry Pinna in the forlorn hope of silencing him as they have other people by personalising criticism. They tried in summer to do the same with the Community Care Action Group by making them the subject of a Parliamentary Motion in a disgraceful unprecedented abuse which led to the Opposition walking out. And why should a GibElec worker be suspended for expressing a view contrary to the Chief Minister on social media? Is there true freedom of expression or are we back to a pervasive culture of fear of speaking out? Where does it end if it starts here?

The fact is that ordinary citizens are not equals in a contest with a Government willing to throw all resources at you. The irony is that it is the people’s money they are using to silence its own citizens. And it is in your name that they govern. So the question for everyone is whether this is the way that we want Gibraltar run and our money spent?

The GHA’s former Head of Clinical Governance says that he found cases of “patient harm” and “preventable death” in the GHA and that he reported this to the Chief Minister in 2020. When this was raised by us in Parliament in May 2021 the Chief Minister denied there was any “shred of evidence” in the “scandalous” allegations of Professor Burke. The Government then proceeded to throw its legal might at him to silence him with an injunction. When under obvious duress Professor Burke withdrew his employment claim against the Government the truth was magically repackaged into one where the Chief Minister had been committed all along to implement reforms based on Professor Burke’s report of 2020. But the original allegations of patient harm and preventable death have not been withdrawn and deserve an independent investigation. This is about lives.

I said in my budget speech that if there was one chant that the Chief Minister would be known for at the end of his tenure it is “No More Lies.” The chant that first greeted him when he met the teachers demonstration in 2019. That chant was the culmination of a reputation that the Chief Minister has crafted for himself as a self-inflicted wound. That chant was not an instant innovation then. It was the product of the frustration many people felt even then two years ago after many and similar examples to the ones I have already given where the Chief Minister bends, twists or plain plays a game with the truth. That does a disservice to Gibraltar and is unforgiveable. Because the truth matters in politics.

And beyond that crisis of truth and governance there are real victims. That is also the story that is being forgotten. People are being left behind or not listened to. The voiceless and the under-privileged. Those of our citizens in sub-standard housing or with real social or health problems who feel they face a constant administrative brick wall and get nowhere fast. Instead, the Government continually insists to all organs of the media that everything is going so well. That sounds hollow to so many people who also see the scramble for riches of a privileged few lucky enough to be in favour. 10 years after being elected on a platform of reform this Government has lost its way.

All that needs to change and radically. But it cannot be changed by Mr Picardo who is in a constant state of denial of this state of affairs, has a hyper sensitive aversion to the slightest criticism and is the author of this culture. We are in a fight for the heart and soul of this community. This will only be changed by the people entrusting a new GSD administration to govern in a way that is completely different and is in the interests of all our people.

Government Should Commit to Reform of Parliament

By | News

It is incomprehensible that a Government that used to say before the election that the Parliament should be reformed should now attempt to pretend that Parliament works well in independently scrutinising the Government. If it believes in reform it should get on with taking the steps necessary to change the working practices of Parliament in the interests of the public and accountability of their decision-making.

Leader of the Opposition Keith Azopardi said: “Trying to justify what is going on by counting the number of times the Parliament has come together last year and comparing it to what used to happen before 2011 is to put a cloak over the truth. In fact, some of those times the Parliament has come together to simply adjourn sessions for 5 minutes or to take Ministerial statements or legislation only but no questions. We can all play the game of comparisons with the past but I thought Mr Picardo did not want to be compared to the GSLP of the 1990s? He said he would do things differently. He knows I have been campaigning to reform of Parliament for longer than he has been GSLP Leader. It doesn’t help him to pretend otherwise or twist the facts.

How does Parliament work when Ministers have not answered questions in Parliament for 5 months? How does Parliament work when Ministers cannot be probed on issues of public importance? The Government is avoiding the accountability of questions from Opposition members and instead sometimes chooses to put out answers by press release which then overtake Parliamentary questions and avoids scrutiny.

The Government knows that we have made significant allowances for the BREXIT and COVID issues. But until mid-December COVID was largely under control and neither that nor Brexit can constantly be used as a shield against accountability. People want to see the Government answer questions in Parliament. If laws are passed without proper scrutiny they can detrimentally affect people’s lives. If the Government think that they are helping their cause by issuing that type of reply they are sadly mistaken. Their attempt to defend themselves by referring to the recent deaths of COVID victims in the same press release is disgraceful.”

It is a fact that in the Unlock the Rock Document the Government said that the Select Committees on various issues would meet after May last year and have not yet done so. They haven’t met since the election in fact. The assertion that the Opposition is somehow taking a lazy approach to Bills is simply false. The Opposition never knows which Bills the Parliament is actually taking on the day. Imagine being asked to attend a meeting and not knowing what subject will actually come up. Under the constitution a Bill cannot be taken before 6 weeks have passed from the date of publication. This is to allow the public to be aware of proposed legislation and allow proper scrutiny. If a Bill is urgent the Chief Minister can certify it as urgent and a Bill can be taken earlier. We have no issue with this practice but there are times that we do not even know that a Bill has been certified as urgent. Recently the Parliament considered the Competition Bill which was over 350 pages with the Opposition only being told on the day that the Bill would be certified urgent. When the Government rams legislation through in that way it does not lead to proper scrutiny of important measures affecting members of the public. That then leads to bad decisions affecting people’s lives.

Laya Comments Unacceptable

By | News
Spain cannot decide who enters Gibraltar and there should not be Spanish officers exercising jurisdiction or control in Gibraltar.
The comments by Spanish Foreign Minister to El Pais as to Spain exercising such powers under the political agreement announced on New Years Eve would be unacceptable if true.

The GSD has not seen the political agreement entered into on 31 December and we make allowances that the Spanish Foreign Minister may be giving issues a gloss for her domestic audience but the Government needs to make clear what it has been prepared to agree.

This once again raises the issue of the need for greater knowledge of the details and the uncertainty that may make the period until a final legally binding Treaty emerges. For the public to be drip fed information over the next 6 months at a time and of a nature of Spain’s choosing will be counterproductive.

Ms Laya has also again emphasized the bilateral nature of the agreements between the UK and Spain. Again this would be unacceptable and was not the understanding the Opposition were being given that this part of the process was trilateral in nature.

Read More